rs587782577
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.3496C>T(p.Arg1166Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000279 in 1,613,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1166L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005732.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | NM_005732.4 | c.3496C>T | p.Arg1166Trp | missense_variant | 23/25 | ENST00000378823.8 | |
TH2LCRR | NR_132124.1 | n.153+57G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | ||||
TH2LCRR | NR_132125.1 | n.354G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | |||
TH2LCRR | NR_132126.1 | n.339G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | ENST00000378823.8 | c.3496C>T | p.Arg1166Trp | missense_variant | 23/25 | 1 | NM_005732.4 | P1 | |
TH2LCRR | ENST00000435042.1 | n.447G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251378Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135862
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000260 AC: 38AN: 1461700Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 727162
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74314
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 15, 2023 | The p.R1166W variant (also known as c.3496C>T), located in coding exon 23 of the RAD50 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 3496. The arginine at codon 1166 is replaced by tryptophan, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This alteration has been identified in individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (Damiola F et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jun;16:R58; Li JY et al. Int J Cancer, 2019 01;144:281-289). This alteration was also identified in a study of 1297 cases of early-onset breast cancer and 1121 controls; however, it was not specified if this variant was seen in a case or control (Young EL et al. J. Med. Genet. 2016 Jun;53:366-76). Additionally, this variant was identified in a cohort of 3,579 African males diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent multi-gene panel testing of 19 DNA repair and cancer predisposition genes (Matejcic M et al. JCO Precis Oncol, 2020 Jan;4:32-43). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 02, 2022 | Variant summary: RAD50 c.3496C>T (p.Arg1166Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.6e-05 in 251378 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.3496C>T has been reported in the literature in settings of multigene panel testing of individuals affected with early onset or high hereditary risk breast cancer (example Damiola_2014, Young_2016, Li_2019). These data do not allow any strong conclusions about the association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 04, 2023 | In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with personal and/or family history of breast cancer as well as in unaffected individuals (PMIDs: 24894818 (2014), 29752822 (2018), and 33471991 (2021)). This variant was also reported in a cohort of men with prostate cancer as well as unaffected individuals (PMID: 32832836 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0002 (7/35434 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at