rs61729035
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000420.3(KEL):c.1475G>A(p.Arg492Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000398 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000420.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEL | NM_000420.3 | c.1475G>A | p.Arg492Gln | missense_variant | 13/19 | ENST00000355265.7 | |
KEL | XM_005249993.2 | c.1511G>A | p.Arg504Gln | missense_variant | 13/19 | ||
KEL | XM_047420357.1 | c.1364G>A | p.Arg455Gln | missense_variant | 12/18 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEL | ENST00000355265.7 | c.1475G>A | p.Arg492Gln | missense_variant | 13/19 | 1 | NM_000420.3 | P1 | |
KEL | ENST00000465697.1 | n.336G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00101 AC: 153AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000429 AC: 108AN: 251470Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000331 AC XY: 45AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000334 AC: 488AN: 1461510Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000316 AC XY: 230AN XY: 727082
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00101 AC: 154AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000873 AC XY: 65AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at