rs61751103
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_001110.4(ADAM10):c.510G>C(p.Gln170His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00111 in 1,612,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- reticulate acropigmentation of KitamuraInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001110.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADAM10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.510G>C | p.Gln170His | missense | Exon 5 of 16 | ENSP00000260408.3 | O14672-1 | ||
| ADAM10 | TSL:1 | c.56-24342G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000386056.1 | B5MC71 | |||
| ADAM10 | TSL:1 | n.*160G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 14 | ENSP00000456542.2 | H3BS53 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00149 AC: 227AN: 152104Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00125 AC: 313AN: 251224 AF XY: 0.00125 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00107 AC: 1557AN: 1460758Hom.: 5 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00105 AC XY: 766AN XY: 726764 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00149 AC: 227AN: 152222Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 112AN XY: 74430 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at