Menu
GeneBe

rs61759485

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_017890.5(VPS13B):c.3386A>G(p.Lys1129Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00487 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K1129E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0044 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 25 hom. )

Consequence

VPS13B
NM_017890.5 missense

Scores

4
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.76
Variant links:
Genes affected
VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009524286).
BP6
Variant 8-99442576-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99442576-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95845.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-99442576-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr8-99442576-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr8-99442576-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
VPS13BNM_017890.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3386A>G p.Lys1129Arg missense_variant 23/62 ENST00000358544.7
VPS13BNM_152564.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3386A>G p.Lys1129Arg missense_variant 23/62 ENST00000357162.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
VPS13BENST00000358544.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3386A>G p.Lys1129Arg missense_variant 23/621 NM_017890.5 Q7Z7G8-1
VPS13BENST00000357162.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3386A>G p.Lys1129Arg missense_variant 23/621 NM_152564.5 P1Q7Z7G8-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00442
AC:
672
AN:
152180
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00613
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00336
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00464
AC:
1166
AN:
251224
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00474
AC XY:
644
AN XY:
135764
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00328
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00434
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00587
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00492
AC:
7197
AN:
1461706
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00487
AC XY:
3542
AN XY:
727158
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00442
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00553
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00540
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00441
AC:
671
AN:
152298
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00407
AC XY:
303
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00315
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00412
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00613
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00332
Alfa
AF:
0.00557
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00459
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00782
AC:
29
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00545
AC:
21
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00363
AC:
16
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00407
AC:
35
ExAC
AF:
0.00518
AC:
629
EpiCase
AF:
0.00485
EpiControl
AF:
0.00640

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cohen syndrome Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 06, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoJul 15, 2022This variant has been reported in the literature in at least 3 individuals with retinal disease including 1 individual with Cohen syndrome (Seifert 2009 PMID:19006247, Tiwari 2016 PMID:27353947, Stone 2017 PMID:28559085). Of note, at least 1 publication notes that this variant is not likely to be disease causing. This variant is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.6% (417/68028) including 1 homozygote (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/8-99442576-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r3). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as Benign or Likely Benign (Variation ID:95845). Evolutionary conservation for this variant is unclear; suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 19, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNov 10, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 22, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 10, 2022Variant summary: VPS13B c.3386A>G (p.Lys1129Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0046 in 251224 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1.9 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in VPS13B causing Cohen Syndrome phenotype (0.0025), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no penetrant association of c.3386A>G in individuals affected with Cohen Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 30, 2013- -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJan 19, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024VPS13B: BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 17, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19006247, 27353947, 28559085) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 28, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
VPS13B-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 19, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.12
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.019
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0095
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.95
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Uncertain
0.025
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.027
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;B
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.28
MPC
0.099
ClinPred
0.041
T
GERP RS
3.3
Varity_R
0.069
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61759485; hg19: chr8-100454804; API