rs61978638
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.2436A>T(p.Lys812Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000167 in 1,571,574 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00078 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CHD7
NM_017780.4 missense
NM_017780.4 missense
Scores
6
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.04
Genes affected
CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PP2
?
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, CHD7
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00971055).
BP6
?
Variant 8-60801587-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60801587-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 198223.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=6, Benign=3}. Variant chr8-60801587-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 118 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | NM_017780.4 | c.2436A>T | p.Lys812Asn | missense_variant | 6/38 | ENST00000423902.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | ENST00000423902.7 | c.2436A>T | p.Lys812Asn | missense_variant | 6/38 | 5 | NM_017780.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000775 AC: 118AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
118
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000240 AC: 45AN: 187124Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000141 AC XY: 14AN XY: 99622
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
45
AN:
187124
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
99622
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000101 AC: 144AN: 1419268Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000769 AC XY: 54AN XY: 702066
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
144
AN:
1419268
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
702066
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000781 AC: 119AN: 152306Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000712 AC XY: 53AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
119
AN:
152306
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
10
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
24
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 12, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 27, 2017 | Variant summary: The CHD7 c.2436A>T (p.Lys812Asn) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 15/29850 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.004964 (15/3022). This frequency is about 113 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CHD7 variant (0.0000438), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. This variant has been reported in one CHARGE syndrome patient without strong evidence for causality (Janssen_HM_2012), and it has been classified as benign by multiple publications (Bergman_HM_2012, Janssen_HM_2012). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as likely benign and one lab classified it as uncertain significance. Taken together, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 08, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 24, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 09, 2018 | The p.Lys812Asn variant in CHD7 is classified as likely benign because it has be en identified in 0.3% (59/19166) of African chromosomes by the Genome Aggregatio n Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applie d: BS1. - |
CHARGE association;C3552553:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | CHD7 NM_017780 exon 6 p.Lys812Asn (c.2436A>T):This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.3% (59/19166) of African alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rs61978638). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:198223). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 03, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CHD7-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 11, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
CHARGE association Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;D
Polyphen
B;.
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of methylation at K812 (P = 7e-04);Loss of methylation at K812 (P = 7e-04);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at