rs67390833
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-G
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
- chr17-58244090-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC-GACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_006151.3(LPO):c.164+22_164+51delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000543 in 920,436 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. It is difficult to determine the true allele frequency of this variant because it is of type DEL_BIG, and the frequency of such variant types in population databases may be underestimated and unreliable. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006151.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006151.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPO | NM_006151.3 | MANE Select | c.164+22_164+51delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC | intron | N/A | NP_006142.1 | |||
| LPO | NM_001160102.2 | c.76+1048_76+1077delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC | intron | N/A | NP_001153574.1 | ||||
| LPO | NR_027647.2 | n.234+1048_234+1077delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPO | ENST00000262290.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.164+22_164+51delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC | intron | N/A | ENSP00000262290.4 | |||
| LPO | ENST00000421678.6 | TSL:1 | c.76+1048_76+1077delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC | intron | N/A | ENSP00000400245.2 | |||
| LPO | ENST00000578403.5 | TSL:1 | n.235+22_235+51delACACACACACACACACACACACACACACAC | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 0
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000543 AC: 5AN: 920436Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000211 AC XY: 1AN XY: 473738 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 0
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at