rs67622085
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.4326T>A(p.Pro1442=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0109 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 111 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1442P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.4326T>A | p.Pro1442= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.4326T>A | p.Pro1442= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00737 AC: 1119AN: 151866Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00719 AC: 1807AN: 251150Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00718 AC XY: 974AN XY: 135734
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0113 AC: 16540AN: 1461858Hom.: 103 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0111 AC XY: 8044AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00736 AC: 1119AN: 151984Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00676 AC XY: 502AN XY: 74280
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Nov 22, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 11, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 17, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 28, 2017 | - - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 26, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | APC: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 15, 2023 | - - |
Gastric cancer;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C1851124:Desmoid disease, hereditary;C2239176:Hepatocellular carcinoma;C2713442:Familial adenomatous polyposis 1;C4749917:Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 04, 2022 | - - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The Pro1442Pro variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, is listed in dbSNP (rs67622085) from a clinical source with an average heterozygosity and standard error of 0.018 +/- 0.093, and a global minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.006 (1000 Genomes). It has not been previously identified by our laboratory among the 973 individuals who have undergone APC testing, but has been reported in the literature in 5/528 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.009) from individuals with colorectal cancer and sporadic ependymomas. It was found at higher frequencies in the 4/282 control chromosomes (frequency 0.014), increasing the likelihood that this is a benign variant (Onilude_2006_16843107, Worm_2004_15133491, Zhou_2004_15122587). In summary, based on the above information, the p.Pro1442ro variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at