rs7130051

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):​c.997-35A>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.158 in 1,548,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20,754 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2556 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.16 ( 18198 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.273

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 11-17558503-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17558503-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 682654.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.243 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOGNM_001292063.2 linkc.997-35A>C intron_variant Intron 9 of 55 ENST00000399397.6 NP_001278992.1
OTOGNM_001277269.2 linkc.1033-35A>C intron_variant Intron 8 of 54 NP_001264198.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOGENST00000399397.6 linkc.997-35A>C intron_variant Intron 9 of 55 5 NM_001292063.2 ENSP00000382329.2
OTOGENST00000485669.1 linkn.446A>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 3 4
OTOGENST00000399391.7 linkc.1033-35A>C intron_variant Intron 8 of 54 5 ENSP00000382323.2
OTOGENST00000498332.5 linkn.903-35A>C intron_variant Intron 8 of 15 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.174
AC:
26397
AN:
152078
Hom.:
2557
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.248
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0802
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.139
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.191
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0887
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.129
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.215
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.163
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.175
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.134
AC:
19587
AN:
146074
AF XY:
0.134
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.252
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0961
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.192
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000742
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.138
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.165
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.156
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.157
AC:
218604
AN:
1396282
Hom.:
18198
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.154
AC XY:
106321
AN XY:
688738
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.250
AC:
7906
AN:
31574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.101
AC:
3595
AN:
35702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.191
AC:
4796
AN:
25158
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00308
AC:
110
AN:
35722
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0988
AC:
7824
AN:
79178
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.138
AC:
6617
AN:
47814
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.209
AC:
1178
AN:
5632
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.165
AC:
177276
AN:
1077552
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.161
AC:
9302
AN:
57950
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9871
19742
29613
39484
49355
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
6404
12808
19212
25616
32020
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.174
AC:
26407
AN:
152196
Hom.:
2556
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.167
AC XY:
12456
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.247
AC:
10266
AN:
41514
American (AMR)
AF:
0.138
AC:
2116
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.191
AC:
661
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
10
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0879
AC:
424
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.129
AC:
1366
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.228
AC:
67
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.163
AC:
11060
AN:
67994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.173
AC:
364
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1153
2306
3459
4612
5765
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
272
544
816
1088
1360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.165
Hom.:
1247
Bravo
AF:
0.178
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0640
AC:
225
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jun 14, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
6.4
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
-0.27
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7130051; hg19: chr11-17580050; API