Menu
GeneBe

rs71473272

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001368067.1(LDB3):c.546T>C(p.Ser182=) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00444 in 1,613,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 44 hom. )

Consequence

LDB3
NM_001368067.1 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001666
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.424
Variant links:
Genes affected
LDB3 (HGNC:15710): (LIM domain binding 3) This gene encodes a PDZ domain-containing protein. PDZ motifs are modular protein-protein interaction domains consisting of 80-120 amino acid residues. PDZ domain-containing proteins interact with each other in cytoskeletal assembly or with other proteins involved in targeting and clustering of membrane proteins. The protein encoded by this gene interacts with alpha-actinin-2 through its N-terminal PDZ domain and with protein kinase C via its C-terminal LIM domains. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich motif defined by 50-60 amino acids containing two zinc-binding modules. This protein also interacts with all three members of the myozenin family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified; all isoforms have N-terminal PDZ domains while only longer isoforms (1, 2 and 5) have C-terminal LIM domains. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 10-86687270-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86687270-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43880.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=7, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr10-86687270-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr10-86687270-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.424 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00352 (536/152202) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0108 (52/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00844. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 278 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 535 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LDB3NM_001368067.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.546T>C p.Ser182= splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant 6/9 ENST00000263066.11
LDB3NM_007078.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.690-4626T>C intron_variant ENST00000361373.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LDB3ENST00000263066.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.546T>C p.Ser182= splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant 6/91 NM_001368067.1 O75112-6
LDB3ENST00000361373.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.690-4626T>C intron_variant 1 NM_007078.3 P4O75112-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00352
AC:
535
AN:
152084
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000652
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00471
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00503
AC:
1253
AN:
249284
Hom.:
9
AF XY:
0.00589
AC XY:
797
AN XY:
135308
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00359
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00677
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00453
AC:
6627
AN:
1461762
Hom.:
44
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00489
AC XY:
3559
AN XY:
727192
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000568
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00407
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00535
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00352
AC:
536
AN:
152202
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00374
AC XY:
278
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000650
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00471
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00568
Alfa
AF:
0.00418
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00345
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 09, 2012Ser182Ser in exon 6 of LDB3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and has been identified in 0.3% (22/6920) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by th e NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs714 73272). Ser182Ser in exon 6 of LDB3 (rs71473272; allele frequency = 0.3%, 22/69 20) ** -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024LDB3: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 28, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Myofibrillar myopathy 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1C Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedcase-controlCytogenetics- Mohapatra Lab, Banaras Hindu UniversityJan 30, 2015- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 31, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000017
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs71473272; hg19: chr10-88447027; API