Menu
GeneBe

rs746822330

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001605.3(AARS1):ā€‹c.2732A>Gā€‹(p.Asn911Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000582 in 1,613,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000061 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AARS1
NM_001605.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.22
Variant links:
Genes affected
AARS1 (HGNC:20): (alanyl-tRNA synthetase 1) The human alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS) belongs to a family of tRNA synthases, of the class II enzymes. Class II tRNA synthases evolved early in evolution and are highly conserved. This is reflected by the fact that 498 of the 968-residue polypeptide human AARS shares 41% identity witht the E.coli protein. tRNA synthases are the enzymes that interpret the RNA code and attach specific aminoacids to the tRNAs that contain the cognate trinucleotide anticodons. They consist of a catalytic domain which interacts with the amino acid acceptor-T psi C helix of the tRNA, and a second domain which interacts with the rest of the tRNA structure. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.049456924).
BP6
Variant 16-70252896-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-70252896-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 320324.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
AARS1NM_001605.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2732A>G p.Asn911Ser missense_variant 21/21 ENST00000261772.13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
AARS1ENST00000261772.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.2732A>G p.Asn911Ser missense_variant 21/211 NM_001605.3 P1P49588-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152062
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000104
AC:
26
AN:
250788
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000103
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135584
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000893
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000530
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000609
AC:
89
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000715
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000842
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000423
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152062
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000404
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74250
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000113
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ExAC
AF:
0.0000659
AC:
8
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicApr 19, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 05, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Reported previously as a variant of uncertain significance in a patient with a suspected diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; however, clinical and segregation information was not provided (Volodarsky et al., 2021); Reported in a patient with Sotos syndrome, intellectual disability, progressive sensory and motor axonal neuropathy, and leg spasticity in the published literature who also had variants in 5 other genes that may have been responsible for the phenotype (Gonzaga-Jauregui et al., 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25817015, 27309375, 32376792, 26257172) -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 01, 2021The p.N911S variant (also known as c.2732A>G), located in coding exon 20 of the AARS gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 2732. The asparagine at codon 911 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant was detected in an individual with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, who also had variants in other genes associated with neuropathy (Gonzaga-Jauregui C et al. Cell Rep, 2015 Aug;12:1169-83). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species; however, serine is the reference amino acid in other vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the supporting evidence, this variant is unlikely to be causative of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, type 2N (CMT2N); however, its contribution to the development of AARS-related early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EIEE) is uncertain. -
AARS1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 08, 2022The AARS1 c.2732A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn911Ser. Asn911Ser. This variant was reported as a variant of uncertain significance in an individual with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; however, pathogenicity was not established (Supplementary Table 2, Volodarsky et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 32376792). This variant is reported in 0.089% of alleles in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-70286799-T-C). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 18, 2023- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2N Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.054
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.85
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.071
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.48
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.049
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.82
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.52
N
MutationTaster
Benign
0.95
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.58
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.090
N
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T
Polyphen
0.0010
B
Vest4
0.14
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
5.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.14
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs746822330; hg19: chr16-70286799; API