rs76094493
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001042413.2(GLIS3):c.2686C>T(p.Leu896Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00661 in 1,613,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 630 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L896L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042413.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIS3 | NM_001042413.2 | c.2686C>T | p.Leu896Phe | missense_variant | 11/11 | ENST00000381971.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIS3 | ENST00000381971.8 | c.2686C>T | p.Leu896Phe | missense_variant | 11/11 | 5 | NM_001042413.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0361 AC: 5500AN: 152148Hom.: 360 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00919 AC: 2300AN: 250170Hom.: 125 AF XY: 0.00634 AC XY: 858AN XY: 135290
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00353 AC: 5155AN: 1461298Hom.: 270 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00300 AC XY: 2179AN XY: 726940
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0362 AC: 5507AN: 152266Hom.: 360 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0339 AC XY: 2527AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 05, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine | Dec 14, 2018 | ACMG criteria: BP4 (REVEL 0.045 + 7 predictors), BA1 (12% in Africans), BS2 (192 homozygotes in gnomAD)= benign - |
Neonatal diabetes mellitus with congenital hypothyroidism Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
GLIS3-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 28, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at