rs7654255
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001080477.4(TENM3):c.3579T>C(p.Tyr1193Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.287 in 1,613,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69,117 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001080477.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 9Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- microphthalmia, isolated, with colobomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENM3 | NM_001080477.4 | c.3579T>C | p.Tyr1193Tyr | synonymous_variant | Exon 19 of 28 | ENST00000511685.6 | NP_001073946.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.293 AC: 44557AN: 151996Hom.: 6830 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.257 AC: 63948AN: 249150 AF XY: 0.254 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.286 AC: 418634AN: 1461442Hom.: 62285 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.283 AC XY: 205808AN XY: 727016 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.293 AC: 44587AN: 152114Hom.: 6832 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.288 AC XY: 21415AN XY: 74364 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at