Menu
GeneBe

rs77210621

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.1752A>G(p.Ala584=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.146 in 1,612,340 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24,109 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A584A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 6866 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 17243 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.447
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 5-251426-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-251426-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130277.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-251426-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.447 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.52 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1752A>G p.Ala584= synonymous_variant 13/15 ENST00000264932.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1752A>G p.Ala584= synonymous_variant 13/151 NM_004168.4 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.240
AC:
36504
AN:
151962
Hom.:
6838
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.525
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.306
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.220
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.165
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0561
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0889
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0817
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.206
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.125
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.233
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.151
AC:
37847
AN:
250352
Hom.:
4372
AF XY:
0.142
AC XY:
19249
AN XY:
135394
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.545
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.188
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0602
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0902
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0858
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.127
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.137
AC:
199524
AN:
1460260
Hom.:
17243
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.134
AC XY:
97380
AN XY:
726562
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.544
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.188
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.165
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0480
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0902
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0884
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.130
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.155
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.241
AC:
36578
AN:
152080
Hom.:
6866
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.235
AC XY:
17459
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.526
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.220
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.165
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0556
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0891
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0817
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.229
Alfa
AF:
0.182
Hom.:
1673
Bravo
AF:
0.268
Asia WGS
AF:
0.114
AC:
400
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 03, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
Cadd
Benign
1.6
Dann
Benign
0.47
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13070; hg19: chr5-251541; COSMIC: COSV53765948; COSMIC: COSV53765948; API