rs786201525
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9606G>A(p.Pro3202Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,613,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P3202P) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.9606G>A | p.Pro3202Pro | synonymous_variant | 26/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9606G>A | p.Pro3202Pro | synonymous_variant | 26/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.9237G>A | p.Pro3079Pro | synonymous_variant | 26/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1664G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 25/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1664G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 25/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251382Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000157 AC: 23AN: 1461726Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74324
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Pro3202Pro was identified in a cohort of Italian ovarian cancer patients, with frequency unspecified, as a polymorphism with no clinical significance (Minucci 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs755890067) “With Likely benign allele”, Clinvitae database (classification likely benign), the ClinVar database (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Invitae), UMD (13X with ”unclassified variant”), co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.4183C>T, p.Gln1395X); and in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 6 of 66734 chromosomes (frequency: 0.00008) from a population of European (Non-Finnish) individuals, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. It was not identified in East Asian, Other, African, Latino, South Asian, and European (Finnish) populations in EXAC. The p.Pro3202Pro variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, 4 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 13, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 21, 2015 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 04, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 05, 2017 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 08, 2019 | - - |
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 13, 2024 | - - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 03, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at