rs786201595

Positions:

• chr16-68823541-C-T
• chr16-68823541-C-A
• chr16-68823541-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):​c.2079C>T​(p.Gly693Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000958 in 1,461,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH1 NM_004360.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:8
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.468

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

ENSG00000260798 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
• BP6: Variant 16-68823541-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68823541-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184654.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=5, Benign=2}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.468 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5	c.2079C>T	p.Gly693Gly	synonymous_variant	13/16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1
CDH1	NM_001317184.2	c.1896C>T	p.Gly632Gly	synonymous_variant	12/15		NP_001304113.1
CDH1	NM_001317185.2	c.531C>T	p.Gly177Gly	synonymous_variant	13/16		NP_001304114.1
CDH1	NM_001317186.2	c.114C>T	p.Gly38Gly	synonymous_variant	12/15		NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10	c.2079C>T	p.Gly693Gly	synonymous_variant	13/16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5 AN: 251388 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 135866

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14 AN: 1461750 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7 AN XY: 727186

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000899

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32

Alfa AF: 0.0000329 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00000378

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1 Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Dec 10, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Sep 20, 2024	This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto	Aug 01, 2022	PS4_Moderate (PMID: 30311375) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Sep 17, 2015	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Jul 24, 2018	- -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

May 04, 2017

- -

CDH1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jun 07, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

May 15, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.62
CADD	Benign	10
DANN	Benign	0.57
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.1

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.090		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs771993728; hg19: chr16-68857444;