rs786201614
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.1986C>T(p.Ala662=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,612,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RAD50
NM_005732.4 synonymous
NM_005732.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.255
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.32).
BP6
?
Variant 5-132595589-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132595589-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184681.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.255 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | NM_005732.4 | c.1986C>T | p.Ala662= | synonymous_variant | 13/25 | ENST00000378823.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | ENST00000378823.8 | c.1986C>T | p.Ala662= | synonymous_variant | 13/25 | 1 | NM_005732.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152122
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251210Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135792
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
251210
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135792
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726550
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
1460206
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
726550
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74298
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152122
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74298
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 20, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 02, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at