rs786202566

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PP3_ModerateBS2_Supporting

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.475T>C​(p.Tyr159His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y159C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

10
8
1

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.65

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
CHEK2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CHEK2-related cancer predisposition
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • acute myeloid leukemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 6 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 69 uncertain in NM_007194.4
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.916
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkc.475T>C p.Tyr159His missense_variant Exon 4 of 15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkc.475T>C p.Tyr159His missense_variant Exon 4 of 15 1 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251414
AF XY:
0.0000147
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000752
AC:
11
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000963
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39678
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000899
AC:
10
AN:
1111974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74332
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15252
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5202
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000479
AC:
1
AN:
2088
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000130
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:5
Feb 19, 2024
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Nov 28, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jul 02, 2018
Mendelics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 04, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 159 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Tyr159His). This variant is present in population databases (rs781254437, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), and/or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 18058223, 21744992, 31300551, 36139606). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 185924). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065, 33986034). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not provided Uncertain:2
Apr 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CHEK2: PM2, PS4:Supporting, BP1 -

Jul 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is denoted CHEK2 c.475T>C at the cDNA level, p.Tyr159His (Y159H) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Tyrosine to a Histidine (TAC>CAC). This variant was observed in a patient with late-onset breast cancer and another with Hodgkin lymphoma, both of whom were from the Czech Republic (Kleibl 2008, Havranek 2015). CHEK2 Tyr159His was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, suggesting it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Tyrosine and Histidine differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. CHEK2 Tyr159His occurs at a position that is conserved across species and is located in within the FHA domain (Desrichard 2011, Roeb 2012). In silico analyses predict that this variant is probably damaging to protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether CHEK2 Tyr159His is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Mar 19, 2024
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces tyrosine with histidine at codon 159 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function. Functional studies have shown the mutant protein to be functional in a yeast complementation assay and in a human cell complementation assay (PMID: 30851065, 37449874), while another functional study has shown the mutant protein to exhibit impaired binding to BRCA1 (PMID: 33986034). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma (PMID: 18058223, 21744992, 31300551) and in an individual who sequentially developed myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PMID: 33986034). This variant has been reported in two breast cancer case-control meta-analyses, reported in 1/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID CHEK2_000180), and 1/73048 cases and 2/88658 controls (PMID: 37449874). This variant has been identified in 5/282816 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Aug 23, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Y159H variant (also known as c.475T>C), located in coding exon 3 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 475. The tyrosine at codon 159 is replaced by histidine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been identified in multiple individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (Kleibl Z et al. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008 Nov;112:159-64; Fostira F et al. J Med Genet, 2020 01;57:53-61; Guindalini RSC et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar;12(1):4190). Additionally, this alteration was identified in an individual diagnosed with Hodgkins lymphoma and in an individual diagnosed with myelomonocytic leukemia and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Havranek O et al. Neoplasma. 2011;58:392-5; Bazinet A et al. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud, 2021 Jun;7:), and has been reported in a cohort of individuals with pancreatic cancer undergoing multigene panel testing (Puccini A et al. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep;14(18). Several functional studies have reported this alteration as retaining normal levels of activity (Delimitsou A et al. Hum. Mutat. 2019 May;40:631-648; Stolarova L et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Aug;29(16):3037-3050). However, another study reported that this variant impaired association with BRCA1 (Bazinet A et al. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2021 Jun;7(3). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

See cases Pathogenic:1
May 12, 2021
Francois Mercier Lab, McGill University
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:in vitro;research

The CHEK2 c.475T>C variant leads to the amino acid change Y159H in the functionally important forkhead-associated (FHA) domain. The FHA domain appears to be critical for the binding to downstream BRCA1 (Li 2002). The Y159H variant is rare in population databases and is predicted as likely damaging to protein function by in silico tools. The variant is considered of uncertain significance by most laboratories and this is supported by the ACMG criteria (PM1, PM2, PP3, Richards 2015). We generated in vitro experimental evidence suggesting the Y159H variant disrupts binding to BRCA1, similarly to the I157T variant that is considered to be pathogenic by some. This consists of additional supporting level evidence for pathogenicity (Brnich 2020). These findings require validation by other laboratories but suggest the Y159H may be likely pathogenic. -

not specified Uncertain:1
Jun 26, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: CHEK2 c.475T>C (p.Tyr159His) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 252780 control chromosomes in gnomAD. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.475T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (example: Kleibl_2008, Fostira_2019, Guindalini_2022) and an individual with myelodysplastic syndrome and leukemia (Bazinet_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function and provided discordant results: Delimitsou_2019 suggested no damaging effect of this variant based on a Yeast functional assay, Bazinet_2021 however suggests a loss-of-function effect of this variant by a CHK2-BRCA1 colocalization assay. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33986034, 30851065, 31300551, 35264596, 18058223, 36139606, 33471991). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 (VUS: 7; Likely pathogenic: 1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Bone osteosarcoma;C2931456:Familial prostate cancer;C5882668:CHEK2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Jan 18, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.78
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.24
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.21
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.66
D;.;D;D;.;D;.;.;D;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.79
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
.;D;.;.;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.10
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.92
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.85
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;M;M;M;.;M;M;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
6.7
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.75
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.2
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;.;.;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.84
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;.;.;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;.;.
Polyphen
0.99
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.69
MutPred
0.74
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0332);
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.93
D
GERP RS
5.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.90
gMVP
0.72
Mutation Taster
=35/65
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs781254437; hg19: chr22-29121082; API