1-119734747-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006623.4(PHGDH):c.624T>C(p.Pro208Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00113 in 1,613,846 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

PHGDH
NM_006623.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.732

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PHGDH (HGNC:8923): (phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase) This gene encodes the enzyme which is involved in the early steps of L-serine synthesis in animal cells. L-serine is required for D-serine and other amino acid synthesis. The enzyme requires NAD/NADH as a cofactor and forms homotetramers for activity. Mutations in this gene have been found in a family with congenital microcephaly, psychomotor retardation and other symptoms. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found, however the full-length nature of most are not known. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

PHGDH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neurometabolic disorder due to serine deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
PHGDH deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Neu-Laxova syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: G2P
Neu-Laxova syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

PHGDH links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 1-119734747-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-119734747-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 292313.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.732 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00589 (896/152014) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0207 (860/41476). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0196. There are 13 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 444 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PHGDH	NM_006623.4 link	c.624T>C	p.Pro208Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 12	ENST00000641023.2	NP_006614.2	O43175

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PHGDH	ENST00000641023.2 link	c.624T>C	p.Pro208Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 12		NM_006623.4	ENSP00000493175.1		O43175

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00589

AC:

894

AN:

151896

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0207

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00164

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00384

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00154

AC:

387

AN:

251448

AF XY:

0.00118

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0221

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000549

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000638

AC:

933

AN:

1461832

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000550

AC XY:

400

AN XY:

727222

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0240

AC:

802

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000648

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000693

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000144

AC:

AN:

1111978

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.431

Heterozygous variant carriers

146

194

243

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

130

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00589

AC:

896

AN:

152014

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00597

AC XY:

444

AN XY:

74328

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0207

AC:

860

AN:

41476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00164

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5118

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4792

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00342

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

67964

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00380

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

154

206

257

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00242

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00661

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

PHGDH deficiency

Benign:4

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 11, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Apr 08, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 15, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neu-Laxova syndrome 1

Benign:1

Apr 11, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PHGDH-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 30, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

8.3

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

-0.73

Mutation Taster

=87/13

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over