1-11980422-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000444836(MFN2):c.-67T>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.502 in 398,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 52,435 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000444836 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.533 AC: 80889AN: 151892Hom.: 22800 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.483 AC: 118876AN: 246028Hom.: 29611 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.479 AC XY: 59770AN XY: 124706
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.533 AC: 80969AN: 152010Hom.: 22824 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.537 AC XY: 39897AN XY: 74312
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
- -
Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with optic atrophy Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1 Benign:1
- -
Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at