1-149926457-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5
The NM_005850.5(SF3B4):c.625C>T(p.Gln209*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005850.5 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Nager acrofacial dysostosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- SF3B4-related acrofacial dysostosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- acrofacial dysostosis Rodriguez typeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005850.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF3B4 | NM_005850.5 | MANE Select | c.625C>T | p.Gln209* | stop_gained | Exon 3 of 6 | NP_005841.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF3B4 | ENST00000271628.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.625C>T | p.Gln209* | stop_gained | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000271628.8 | ||
| SF3B4 | ENST00000457312.1 | TSL:5 | c.496C>T | p.Gln166* | stop_gained | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000391114.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Nager syndrome Pathogenic:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at