1-150805997-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 4P and 3B. PM1PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_000396.4(CTSK):ā€‹c.263A>Cā€‹(p.Gln88Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000669 in 1,614,234 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000069 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CTSK
NM_000396.4 missense

Scores

2
11
6

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.506
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTSK (HGNC:2536): (cathepsin K) The protein encoded by this gene is a lysosomal cysteine proteinase involved in bone remodeling and resorption. This protein, which is a member of the peptidase C1 protein family, is predominantly expressed in osteoclasts. However, the encoded protein is also expressed in a significant fraction of human breast cancers, where it could contribute to tumor invasiveness. Mutations in this gene are the cause of pycnodysostosis, an autosomal recessive disease characterized by osteosclerosis and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a propeptide Activation peptide (size 98) in uniprot entity CATK_HUMAN there are 10 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (83%) in NM_000396.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.093060195).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000459 (7/152346) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00145 (7/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000679. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 5 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CTSKNM_000396.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.263A>C p.Gln88Pro missense_variant 4/8 ENST00000271651.8 NP_000387.1 P43235

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CTSKENST00000271651.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.263A>C p.Gln88Pro missense_variant 4/81 NM_000396.4 ENSP00000271651.3 P43235

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000123
AC:
31
AN:
251436
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000184
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
135886
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000691
AC:
101
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000105
AC XY:
76
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000132
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000459
AC:
7
AN:
152346
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000671
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000496
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378
ExAC
AF:
0.000173
AC:
21
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pyknodysostosis Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingHuman Genetics Unit, University Of ColomboDec 28, 2023This variant was observed in compound heterozygosity with variant (NM_000396.3:c.568C>T) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylNov 14, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Feb 20, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 26, 2021Variant summary: CTSK c.263A>C (p.Gln88Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the CTSK proregion (Pangrazio_2014) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 251436 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in CTSK causing Pyknodysostosis (0.00012 vs 0.0011), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.263A>C has been reported in the literature in at-least one comprehensively genotyped (WES) homozygous individual affected with mild Osteoporosis (example, Pangrazio_2014) and subsequently cited by others. These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as uncertain significance citing overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly pathogenic. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.50
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.028
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.21
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.55
D;T
Eigen
Benign
0.021
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.15
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.20
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.093
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.57
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.53
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.86
Sift
Uncertain
0.010
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;.
Polyphen
0.093
B;.
Vest4
0.70
MutPred
0.42
Gain of ubiquitination at K89 (P = 0.0598);.;
MVP
0.99
MPC
0.40
ClinPred
0.099
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.91
gMVP
0.86

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs762212949; hg19: chr1-150778473; API