chr1-150805997-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS1
The NM_000396.4(CTSK):c.263A>C(p.Gln88Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000669 in 1,614,234 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000396.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- pycnodysostosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000396.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTSK | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.263A>C | p.Gln88Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 8 | ENSP00000271651.3 | P43235 | ||
| CTSK | TSL:3 | c.440A>C | p.Gln147Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 8 | ENSP00000405083.2 | Q5QP40 | ||
| CTSK | c.305A>C | p.Gln102Pro | missense | Exon 5 of 9 | ENSP00000503876.1 | A0A7I2V4B6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000123 AC: 31AN: 251436 AF XY: 0.000184 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000691 AC: 101AN: 1461888Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000105 AC XY: 76AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000459 AC: 7AN: 152346Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000671 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74506 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at