1-15578893-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_024758.5(AGMAT):c.686C>T(p.Thr229Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000864 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024758.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGMAT | NM_024758.5 | c.686C>T | p.Thr229Met | missense_variant | 4/7 | ENST00000375826.4 | NP_079034.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGMAT | ENST00000375826.4 | c.686C>T | p.Thr229Met | missense_variant | 4/7 | 1 | NM_024758.5 | ENSP00000364986 | P1 | |
DNAJC16 | ENST00000483270.1 | n.2726+3421G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00414 AC: 630AN: 152132Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00109 AC: 275AN: 251220Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000766 AC XY: 104AN XY: 135808
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000520 AC: 760AN: 1461884Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000485 AC XY: 353AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00416 AC: 634AN: 152250Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00388 AC XY: 289AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 30, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at