1-156138700-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.1911C>T(p.Phe637Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 1,613,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

LMNA
NM_170707.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.218

Variant links:

Genes affected

LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

LMNA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.32).

BP6

Variant 1-156138700-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-156138700-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48055.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-156138700-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-156138700-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.218 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000506 (77/152318) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00925 (48/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00717. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 45 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LMNA	NM_170707.4 link	c.1911C>T	p.Phe637Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12	ENST00000368300.9	NP_733821.1	P02545-1A0A384MQX1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
LMNA	ENST00000368300.9 link	c.1911C>T	p.Phe637Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12	1	NM_170707.4	ENSP00000357283.4		P02545-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000512

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000410

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00942

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000695

AC:

173

AN:

248902

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000725

AC XY:

AN XY:

135120

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00699

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000850

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000894

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00148

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000290

AC:

424

AN:

1461316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000298

AC XY:

217

AN XY:

726988

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000239

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00385

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000997

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000818

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00139

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000506

AC:

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000604

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000409

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00925

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Bravo

AF:

0.000261

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0110

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:18

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Nov 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

LMNA: BP4, BP7 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:5

Aug 29, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2020

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 05, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Phe637Phe in exon 11 of LMNA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. This variant has been identified in 0.3% (7/23 34) of chromosomes from a broad, though clinically and racially unspecified popu lation (dbSNP rs117939448) and in 3/3738 African American chromosomes in a borad and clinically unspecified cohort (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). Phe637Ph e in exon 11 of LMNA (rs117939448; 0.3%, 7/2334) -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Jul 22, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Apr 07, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.32

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.88

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over