1-204155161-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000537.4(REN):​c.1076A>T​(p.Lys359Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000136 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

REN
NM_000537.4 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.970
Variant links:
Genes affected
REN (HGNC:9958): (renin) This gene encodes renin, an aspartic protease that is secreted by the kidneys. Renin is a part of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system involved in regulation of blood pressure, and electrolyte balance. This enzyme catalyzes the first step in the activation pathway of angiotensinogen by cleaving angiotensinogen to form angiotensin I, which is then converted to angiotensin II by angiotensin I converting enzyme. This cascade can result in aldosterone release, narrowing of blood vessels, and increase in blood pressure as angiotension II is a vasoconstrictive peptide. Transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms and that arise from alternative splicing and the use of alternative promoters have been described, but their full-length nature has not been determined. Mutations in this gene have been shown to cause hyperuricemic nephropathy familial juvenile 2, familial hyperproreninemia, and renal tubular dysgenesis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.028822571).
BP6
Variant 1-204155161-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-204155161-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 294950.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RENNM_000537.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076A>T p.Lys359Ile missense_variant 10/10 ENST00000272190.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RENENST00000272190.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076A>T p.Lys359Ile missense_variant 10/101 NM_000537.4 P1P00797-1
RENENST00000638118.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.962A>T p.Lys321Ile missense_variant 12/125

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000961
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000682
AC:
17
AN:
249112
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000742
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
134854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000924
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
17
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000963
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000961
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000340
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 30, 2023The c.1076A>T (p.K359I) alteration is located in exon 10 (coding exon 10) of the REN gene. This alteration results from a A to T substitution at nucleotide position 1076, causing the lysine (K) at amino acid position 359 to be replaced by an isoleucine (I). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Renal tubular dysgenesis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.34
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.63
D;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.87
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.87
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.37
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.019
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.029
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.039
Sift
Benign
0.093
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;.
Polyphen
0.0010
B;.
Vest4
0.16
MutPred
0.41
Loss of ubiquitination at K359 (P = 0.0092);.;
MVP
0.64
MPC
0.42
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.53
gMVP
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs774166976; hg19: chr1-204124289; API