Menu
GeneBe

1-204155847-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000537.4(REN):c.1032G>A(p.Thr344=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000911 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000092 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

REN
NM_000537.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
REN (HGNC:9958): (renin) This gene encodes renin, an aspartic protease that is secreted by the kidneys. Renin is a part of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system involved in regulation of blood pressure, and electrolyte balance. This enzyme catalyzes the first step in the activation pathway of angiotensinogen by cleaving angiotensinogen to form angiotensin I, which is then converted to angiotensin II by angiotensin I converting enzyme. This cascade can result in aldosterone release, narrowing of blood vessels, and increase in blood pressure as angiotension II is a vasoconstrictive peptide. Transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms and that arise from alternative splicing and the use of alternative promoters have been described, but their full-length nature has not been determined. Mutations in this gene have been shown to cause hyperuricemic nephropathy familial juvenile 2, familial hyperproreninemia, and renal tubular dysgenesis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 1-204155847-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-204155847-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 876616.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.42 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 12 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RENNM_000537.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1032G>A p.Thr344= synonymous_variant 9/10 ENST00000272190.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RENENST00000272190.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1032G>A p.Thr344= synonymous_variant 9/101 NM_000537.4 P1P00797-1
RENENST00000638118.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.918G>A p.Thr306= synonymous_variant 11/125

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000789
AC:
12
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000199
AC:
50
AN:
251216
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000214
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
135768
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000792
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000924
AC:
135
AN:
1461738
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
727154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000315
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152292
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000806
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000174
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000491
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal tubular dysgenesis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 22, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 22, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 27, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
Cadd
Benign
0.30
Dann
Benign
0.92

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149479425; hg19: chr1-204124975; API