1-215674202-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.13709G>A​(p.Arg4570His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00126 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R4570P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

1
1
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.773
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr1-215674203-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009426177).
BP6
Variant 1-215674202-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-215674202-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48422.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-215674202-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00122 (1780/1461856) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.017 (98/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0143. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 933 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkc.13709G>A p.Arg4570His missense_variant Exon 63 of 72 ENST00000307340.8 NP_996816.3 O75445-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkc.13709G>A p.Arg4570His missense_variant Exon 63 of 72 1 NM_206933.4 ENSP00000305941.3 O75445-1
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkc.13709G>A p.Arg4570His missense_variant Exon 63 of 73 ENSP00000501296.1 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00170
AC:
258
AN:
152098
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00186
AC:
467
AN:
251312
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00201
AC XY:
273
AN XY:
135808
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000959
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00294
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00122
AC:
1780
AN:
1461856
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
933
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00323
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000602
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00280
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00169
AC:
258
AN:
152216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00193
AC XY:
144
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00517
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00171
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00180
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00128
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.00160
AC:
194
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00234
EpiControl
AF:
0.00142

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Oct 29, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 07, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Arg4570His in exon 63 of USH2A: This variant has been identified in a proband wi th Usher syndrome type 2 and in a proband with nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa (McGee 2010). However, in both cases the variant was in heterozygous form witho ut a variant on the second allele and this variant was classified as benign (McG ee 2010). This is consistent with our computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, Al ignGVGD) which do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. In add ition, this variant has also been reported in dbSNP with a frequency of 0.6% (43 /6927) control chromosomes (rs730254). In summary, this evidence suggests the va riant is benign. -

Feb 15, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

USH2A: BP4, BS1 -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:2
Jan 13, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 39 Uncertain:1
Apr 08, 2021
Ocular Genomics Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

The USH2A c.13709G>A variant was identified in an individual with retinitis pigmentosa with a presumed recessive inheritance pattern. Through a review of available evidence we were able to apply the following criteria: BP4. Based on this evidence we have classified this variant as Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Uncertain
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.13
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.23
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.43
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.66
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0094
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.72
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Benign
0.14
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T
Polyphen
0.45
B
Vest4
0.10
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.038
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
3.6
Varity_R
0.077
gMVP
0.39

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs730254; hg19: chr1-215847544; API