1-215782813-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.10510C>G​(p.Pro3504Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000978 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P3504L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00063 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

2
15

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.12

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
USH2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa 39
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011390686).
BP6
Variant 1-215782813-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-215782813-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 178577.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
USH2A
NM_206933.4
MANE Select
c.10510C>Gp.Pro3504Ala
missense
Exon 53 of 72NP_996816.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
USH2A
ENST00000307340.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.10510C>Gp.Pro3504Ala
missense
Exon 53 of 72ENSP00000305941.3
USH2A
ENST00000674083.1
c.10510C>Gp.Pro3504Ala
missense
Exon 53 of 73ENSP00000501296.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000624
AC:
95
AN:
152126
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00162
AC:
408
AN:
251208
AF XY:
0.00231
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000654
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00101
AC:
1482
AN:
1461706
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00142
AC XY:
1034
AN XY:
727156
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
1050
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000562
AC:
3
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000694
AC:
4
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000340
AC:
378
AN:
1111894
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000679
AC:
41
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
84
169
253
338
422
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000631
AC:
96
AN:
152244
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000913
AC XY:
68
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0135
AC:
65
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000397
AC:
27
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
9
13
18
22
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000314
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000246
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.00196
AC:
238
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 12, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22135276, 28281779, 25999674)

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

USH2A: BP4, BS1, BS2

Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Dec 16, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 04, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
Dec 14, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro3504Ala in Exon 53 of USH2A: This variant has been reported as a `likely ne utral? variant in an Usher syndrome study based on either its presence in an aff ected individual who carried two other causative variants or because it did not segregate with disease (Le Quesne Stabej 2012). It was also identified in 1/878 (0.12%) control chromosomes by the same study (Le Quesne Stabej 2012), and in 1. 1% (348/30782) of South Asian chromosomes including 8 homozygotes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; rs200372118). Th e proline (Pro) residue at position 3504 is not conserved in several species mam mals, with rat and mouse having an alanine (Ala), and computational tools (amino acid biochemical properties, SIFT, PolyPhen-2, AlignGVGD) do not suggest an imp act to the protein. In summary, this variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance based on the conservation and computational data, and its presence in the general population.

Oct 24, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis pigmentosa 39 Benign:1
Nov 04, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.076
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.54
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.92
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.32
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.40
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.68
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L
PhyloP100
2.1
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.9
D
REVEL
Benign
0.049
Sift
Benign
0.37
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T
Polyphen
0.13
B
Vest4
0.70
MVP
0.81
MPC
0.032
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
3.3
Varity_R
0.053
gMVP
0.60
Mutation Taster
=54/46
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200372118; hg19: chr1-215956155; API