1-215782813-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):āc.10510C>Gā(p.Pro3504Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000978 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P3504L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | NM_206933.4 | c.10510C>G | p.Pro3504Ala | missense_variant | 53/72 | ENST00000307340.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | ENST00000307340.8 | c.10510C>G | p.Pro3504Ala | missense_variant | 53/72 | 1 | NM_206933.4 | P1 | |
USH2A | ENST00000674083.1 | c.10510C>G | p.Pro3504Ala | missense_variant | 53/73 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000624 AC: 95AN: 152126Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00162 AC: 408AN: 251208Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00231 AC XY: 314AN XY: 135762
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00101 AC: 1482AN: 1461706Hom.: 20 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00142 AC XY: 1034AN XY: 727156
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000631 AC: 96AN: 152244Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000913 AC XY: 68AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 12, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22135276, 28281779, 25999674) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2023 | USH2A: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 16, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 04, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 24, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 14, 2017 | p.Pro3504Ala in Exon 53 of USH2A: This variant has been reported as a `likely ne utral? variant in an Usher syndrome study based on either its presence in an aff ected individual who carried two other causative variants or because it did not segregate with disease (Le Quesne Stabej 2012). It was also identified in 1/878 (0.12%) control chromosomes by the same study (Le Quesne Stabej 2012), and in 1. 1% (348/30782) of South Asian chromosomes including 8 homozygotes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; rs200372118). Th e proline (Pro) residue at position 3504 is not conserved in several species mam mals, with rat and mouse having an alanine (Ala), and computational tools (amino acid biochemical properties, SIFT, PolyPhen-2, AlignGVGD) do not suggest an imp act to the protein. In summary, this variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance based on the conservation and computational data, and its presence in the general population. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 39 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 04, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at