rs200372118
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.10510C>G(p.Pro3504Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000978 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P3504L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 2AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 39Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000624 AC: 95AN: 152126Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00162 AC: 408AN: 251208 AF XY: 0.00231 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00101 AC: 1482AN: 1461706Hom.: 20 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00142 AC XY: 1034AN XY: 727156 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000631 AC: 96AN: 152244Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000913 AC XY: 68AN XY: 74452 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at