1-216323590-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.1434G>C​(p.Glu478Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0161 in 1,613,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 253 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E478E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 18 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 235 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0430

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
USH2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa 39
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007865071).
BP6
Variant 1-216323590-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216323590-C-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 48437.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0126 (1920/152048) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0187 (1270/67972). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0178. There are 18 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 921 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 18 AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
USH2A
NM_206933.4
MANE Select
c.1434G>Cp.Glu478Asp
missense
Exon 8 of 72NP_996816.3
USH2A
NM_007123.6
c.1434G>Cp.Glu478Asp
missense
Exon 8 of 21NP_009054.6

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
USH2A
ENST00000307340.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1434G>Cp.Glu478Asp
missense
Exon 8 of 72ENSP00000305941.3
USH2A
ENST00000366942.3
TSL:1
c.1434G>Cp.Glu478Asp
missense
Exon 8 of 21ENSP00000355909.3
USH2A
ENST00000674083.1
c.1434G>Cp.Glu478Asp
missense
Exon 8 of 73ENSP00000501296.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0126
AC:
1920
AN:
151932
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0713
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0121
AC:
3034
AN:
250826
AF XY:
0.0119
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00811
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0184
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0137
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0165
AC:
24111
AN:
1461464
Hom.:
235
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0163
AC XY:
11829
AN XY:
727034
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00293
AC:
98
AN:
33454
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00882
AC:
394
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0183
AC:
479
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39628
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
210
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0165
AC:
883
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00365
AC:
21
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0190
AC:
21163
AN:
1111776
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0143
AC:
863
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1358
2717
4075
5434
6792
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
784
1568
2352
3136
3920
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0126
AC:
1920
AN:
152048
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0124
AC XY:
921
AN XY:
74270
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00352
AC:
146
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
174
AN:
15254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0233
AC:
81
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0151
AC:
159
AN:
10544
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0187
AC:
1270
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00851
AC:
18
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
105
210
315
420
525
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0174
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0124
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0151
AC:
56
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0174
AC:
67
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00409
AC:
18
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0157
AC:
135
ExAC
AF:
0.0118
AC:
1437
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0171
EpiControl
AF:
0.0179

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Sep 22, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 24, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 17, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:4
May 14, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

USH2A: BP4, BS1, BS2

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 20, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 18, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinal dystrophy Benign:2
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Jan 01, 2016
Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.56
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.31
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.22
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0079
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
M
PhyloP100
0.043
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N
REVEL
Benign
0.044
Sift
Benign
0.15
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.037
D
Polyphen
0.10
B
Vest4
0.076
MutPred
0.65
Loss of ubiquitination at K481 (P = 0.1778)
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
0.84
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.44
Mutation Taster
=92/8
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35730265; hg19: chr1-216496932; COSMIC: COSV99048308; API