1-216323590-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):āc.1434G>Cā(p.Glu478Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0161 in 1,613,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 253 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E478E) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | NM_206933.4 | c.1434G>C | p.Glu478Asp | missense_variant | 8/72 | ENST00000307340.8 | |
USH2A | NM_007123.6 | c.1434G>C | p.Glu478Asp | missense_variant | 8/21 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | ENST00000307340.8 | c.1434G>C | p.Glu478Asp | missense_variant | 8/72 | 1 | NM_206933.4 | P1 | |
USH2A | ENST00000366942.3 | c.1434G>C | p.Glu478Asp | missense_variant | 8/21 | 1 | |||
USH2A | ENST00000674083.1 | c.1434G>C | p.Glu478Asp | missense_variant | 8/73 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0126 AC: 1920AN: 151932Hom.: 18 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0121 AC: 3034AN: 250826Hom.: 40 AF XY: 0.0119 AC XY: 1607AN XY: 135526
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0165 AC: 24111AN: 1461464Hom.: 235 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0163 AC XY: 11829AN XY: 727034
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0126 AC: 1920AN: 152048Hom.: 18 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0124 AC XY: 921AN XY: 74270
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 22, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 24, 2009 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 17, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 20, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | USH2A: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 14, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at