rs35730265

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):ā€‹c.1434G>Cā€‹(p.Glu478Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0161 in 1,613,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 253 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E478E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.013 ( 18 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.016 ( 235 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0430
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a domain Laminin N-terminal (size 246) in uniprot entity USH2A_HUMAN there are 107 pathogenic changes around while only 17 benign (86%) in NM_206933.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007865071).
BP6
Variant 1-216323590-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216323590-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48437.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=8, Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-216323590-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic]. Variant chr1-216323590-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-216323590-C-G is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0126 (1920/152048) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0187 (1270/67972). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0178. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 921 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 18 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1434G>C p.Glu478Asp missense_variant 8/72 ENST00000307340.8
USH2ANM_007123.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1434G>C p.Glu478Asp missense_variant 8/21

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1434G>C p.Glu478Asp missense_variant 8/721 NM_206933.4 P1O75445-1
USH2AENST00000366942.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1434G>C p.Glu478Asp missense_variant 8/211 O75445-2
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1434G>C p.Glu478Asp missense_variant 8/73 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0126
AC:
1920
AN:
151932
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0713
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0121
AC:
3034
AN:
250826
Hom.:
40
AF XY:
0.0119
AC XY:
1607
AN XY:
135526
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00811
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0184
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0137
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0165
AC:
24111
AN:
1461464
Hom.:
235
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0163
AC XY:
11829
AN XY:
727034
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00293
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00882
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00243
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0165
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0143
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0126
AC:
1920
AN:
152048
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0124
AC XY:
921
AN XY:
74270
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.0174
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0124
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0151
AC:
56
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0174
AC:
67
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00409
AC:
18
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0157
AC:
135
ExAC
AF:
0.0118
AC:
1437
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0171
EpiControl
AF:
0.0179

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 22, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 24, 2009- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 17, 2022- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 20, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024USH2A: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 14, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.56
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.31
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.22
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0079
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.044
Sift
Benign
0.15
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.037
D;T
Polyphen
0.10
B;B
Vest4
0.076
MutPred
0.65
Loss of ubiquitination at K481 (P = 0.1778);Loss of ubiquitination at K481 (P = 0.1778);
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
0.84
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35730265; hg19: chr1-216496932; COSMIC: COSV99048308; API