1-21833840-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_005529.7(HSPG2):c.10806C>A(p.Pro3602=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000337 in 1,602,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P3602P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005529.7 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPG2 | NM_005529.7 | c.10806C>A | p.Pro3602= | synonymous_variant | 78/97 | ENST00000374695.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPG2 | ENST00000374695.8 | c.10806C>A | p.Pro3602= | synonymous_variant | 78/97 | 1 | NM_005529.7 | P1 | |
HSPG2 | ENST00000471322.2 | n.1161C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/5 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000564 AC: 13AN: 230456Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000724 AC XY: 9AN XY: 124232
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000303 AC: 44AN: 1449784Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000264 AC XY: 19AN XY: 720006
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000656 AC: 10AN: 152362Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74520
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 04, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 27, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at