1-21873961-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_005529.7(HSPG2):c.3707C>A(p.Ala1236Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00268 in 1,605,542 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1236V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005529.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Schwartz-Jampel syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
- Silverman-Handmaker type dyssegmental dysplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Schwartz-Jampel syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005529.7. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00184 AC: 280AN: 152168Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00163 AC: 383AN: 235252 AF XY: 0.00173 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00276 AC: 4018AN: 1453256Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00272 AC XY: 1962AN XY: 721772 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00183 AC: 279AN: 152286Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00145 AC XY: 108AN XY: 74462 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at