1-228413805-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_016102.4(TRIM17):c.517G>A(p.Glu173Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00239 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 99 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016102.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIM17 | NM_016102.4 | c.517G>A | p.Glu173Lys | missense_variant | 3/7 | ENST00000366698.7 | NP_057186.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIM17 | ENST00000366698.7 | c.517G>A | p.Glu173Lys | missense_variant | 3/7 | 1 | NM_016102.4 | ENSP00000355659 | P1 | |
ENST00000701501.1 | n.283+6327C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0124 AC: 1891AN: 152220Hom.: 50 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00332 AC: 835AN: 251252Hom.: 15 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 329AN XY: 135840
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00134 AC: 1960AN: 1461742Hom.: 49 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00115 AC XY: 837AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0124 AC: 1895AN: 152338Hom.: 50 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0117 AC XY: 874AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 19, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at