1-239907543-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001375978.1(CHRM3):c.92C>T(p.Pro31Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P31R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001375978.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRM3 | NM_001375978.1 | c.92C>T | p.Pro31Leu | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | ENST00000676153.1 | NP_001362907.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251398 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000212 AC: 31AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74320 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.92C>T (p.P31L) alteration is located in exon 5 (coding exon 1) of the CHRM3 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 92, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 31 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at