1-248180245-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001004688.2(OR2M2):āc.260C>Gā(p.Ser87Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00212 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 61 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001004688.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR2M2 | NM_001004688.2 | c.260C>G | p.Ser87Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000641836.1 | NP_001004688.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR2M2 | ENST00000641836.1 | c.260C>G | p.Ser87Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | NM_001004688.2 | ENSP00000493201 | P1 | ||
OR2M2 | ENST00000641211.1 | c.260C>G | p.Ser87Cys | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENSP00000492974 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0109 AC: 1656AN: 152170Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00288 AC: 725AN: 251446Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00201 AC XY: 273AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00119 AC: 1744AN: 1461866Hom.: 38 Cov.: 73 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 746AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0110 AC: 1682AN: 152288Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0114 AC XY: 849AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 07, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at