1-26182558-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_006314.3(CNKSR1):c.598G>A(p.Glu200Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000148 in 1,613,288 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006314.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNKSR1 | NM_006314.3 | c.598G>A | p.Glu200Lys | missense_variant | 6/21 | ENST00000361530.11 | NP_006305.2 | |
CNKSR1 | NM_001297647.2 | c.598G>A | p.Glu200Lys | missense_variant | 6/21 | NP_001284576.1 | ||
CNKSR1 | NM_001297648.2 | c.-177G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 6/21 | NP_001284577.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNKSR1 | ENST00000361530.11 | c.598G>A | p.Glu200Lys | missense_variant | 6/21 | 1 | NM_006314.3 | ENSP00000354609 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000822 AC: 125AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000231 AC: 58AN: 251086Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000155 AC XY: 21AN XY: 135760
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000753 AC: 110AN: 1461038Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000715 AC XY: 52AN XY: 726818
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000847 AC: 129AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000846 AC XY: 63AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at