1-32775300-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_003680.4(YARS1):c.*681T>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00657 in 152,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0066 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
YARS1
NM_003680.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_003680.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.483
Genes affected
YARS1 (HGNC:12840): (tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1) Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of tRNA by their cognate amino acid. Because of their central role in linking amino acids with nucleotide triplets contained in tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are thought to be among the first proteins that appeared in evolution. Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase belongs to the class I tRNA synthetase family. Cytokine activities have also been observed for the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, after it is split into two parts, an N-terminal fragment that harbors the catalytic site and a C-terminal fragment found only in the mammalian enzyme. The N-terminal fragment is an interleukin-8-like cytokine, whereas the released C-terminal fragment is an EMAP II-like cytokine. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 1-32775300-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-32775300-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 297134.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency = 0.167 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YARS1 | NM_003680.4 | c.*681T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000373477.9 | ||
YARS1 | XM_011542347.3 | c.*681T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 11/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YARS1 | ENST00000373477.9 | c.*681T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_003680.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00658 AC: 1001AN: 152188Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1001
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00175 AC: 1AN: 572Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00298 AC XY: 1AN XY: 336
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
572
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
336
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00659 AC: 1003AN: 152306Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00670 AC XY: 499AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1003
AN:
152306
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
499
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate C Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at