1-40307477-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001852.4(COL9A2):​c.977A>G​(p.Gln326Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.253 in 1,613,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 59,315 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q326W) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.30 ( 7863 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.25 ( 51452 hom. )

Consequence

COL9A2
NM_001852.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.555

Publications

55 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL9A2 (HGNC:2218): (collagen type IX alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the three alpha chains of type IX collagen, the major collagen component of hyaline cartilage. Type IX collagen, a heterotrimeric molecule, is usually found in tissues containing type II collagen, a fibrillar collagen. This chain is unusual in that, unlike the other two type IX alpha chains, it contains a covalently attached glycosaminoglycan side chain. Mutations in this gene are associated with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
COL9A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • epiphyseal dysplasia, multiple, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Stickler syndrome, type 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia due to collagen 9 anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=3.5691442E-5).
BP6
Variant 1-40307477-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-40307477-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258399.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.602 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL9A2NM_001852.4 linkc.977A>G p.Gln326Arg missense_variant Exon 19 of 32 ENST00000372748.8 NP_001843.1 Q14055

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL9A2ENST00000372748.8 linkc.977A>G p.Gln326Arg missense_variant Exon 19 of 32 1 NM_001852.4 ENSP00000361834.3 Q14055
COL9A2ENST00000482722.5 linkn.1280A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 18 of 31 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.300
AC:
45539
AN:
151986
Hom.:
7827
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.408
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.265
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.363
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.200
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.620
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.305
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.234
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.149
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.213
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.249
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.304
AC:
76240
AN:
250534
AF XY:
0.290
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.410
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.481
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.600
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.242
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.215
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.254
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.249
AC:
363223
AN:
1461022
Hom.:
51452
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.248
AC XY:
180398
AN XY:
726830
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.420
AC:
14043
AN:
33452
American (AMR)
AF:
0.466
AC:
20789
AN:
44636
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.204
AC:
5325
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.652
AC:
25869
AN:
39684
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.288
AC:
24841
AN:
86218
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.245
AC:
13105
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.175
AC:
1009
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.218
AC:
242476
AN:
1111388
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.261
AC:
15766
AN:
60358
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14569
29138
43708
58277
72846
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8814
17628
26442
35256
44070
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.300
AC:
45640
AN:
152104
Hom.:
7863
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.303
AC XY:
22540
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.409
AC:
16979
AN:
41486
American (AMR)
AF:
0.363
AC:
5549
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.200
AC:
695
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.620
AC:
3192
AN:
5150
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.305
AC:
1471
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.234
AC:
2479
AN:
10576
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.160
AC:
47
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.213
AC:
14455
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.251
AC:
531
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1559
3118
4678
6237
7796
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
446
892
1338
1784
2230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.243
Hom.:
8220
Bravo
AF:
0.317
TwinsUK
AF:
0.230
AC:
851
ALSPAC
AF:
0.214
AC:
825
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.403
AC:
1777
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.214
AC:
1840
ExAC
AF:
0.301
AC:
36519
Asia WGS
AF:
0.472
AC:
1640
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.208
EpiControl
AF:
0.200

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 29, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Epiphyseal dysplasia, multiple, 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.065
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.77
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.12
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.94
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.71
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.031
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.21
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.000036
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.95
L
PhyloP100
0.56
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.82
N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.56
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.042
MPC
0.28
ClinPred
0.0022
T
GERP RS
5.0
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.22
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2228564; hg19: chr1-40773149; COSMIC: COSV107474543; COSMIC: COSV107474543; API