1-42929964-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_006516.4(SLC2A1):c.588G>A(p.Pro196=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.193 in 1,613,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31,668 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 2279 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.20 ( 29389 hom. )
Consequence
SLC2A1
NM_006516.4 synonymous
NM_006516.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -5.43
Genes affected
SLC2A1 (HGNC:11005): (solute carrier family 2 member 1) This gene encodes a major glucose transporter in the mammalian blood-brain barrier. The encoded protein is found primarily in the cell membrane and on the cell surface, where it can also function as a receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) I and II. Mutations in this gene have been found in a family with paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 1-42929964-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42929964-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95414.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-42929964-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.43 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.208 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A1 | NM_006516.4 | c.588G>A | p.Pro196= | synonymous_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000426263.10 | NP_006507.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A1 | ENST00000426263.10 | c.588G>A | p.Pro196= | synonymous_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_006516.4 | ENSP00000416293 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.157 AC: 23827AN: 151950Hom.: 2275 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
23827
AN:
151950
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.184 AC: 46362AN: 251344Hom.: 4683 AF XY: 0.189 AC XY: 25702AN XY: 135830
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
46362
AN:
251344
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25702
AN XY:
135830
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.197 AC: 288354AN: 1461812Hom.: 29389 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.198 AC XY: 144029AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
288354
AN:
1461812
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
144029
AN XY:
727210
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.157 AC: 23837AN: 152068Hom.: 2279 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.159 AC XY: 11816AN XY: 74318
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
23837
AN:
152068
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
11816
AN XY:
74318
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
407
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 27, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jul 15, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 40% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 37. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Encephalopathy due to GLUT1 deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 14, 2017 | - - |
Dystonia 9 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 22, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Childhood onset GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 1, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cryohydrocytosis with reduced stomatin Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at