1-45331227-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000456914.7(MUTYH):ā€‹c.1347G>Cā€‹(p.Thr449=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00288 in 1,614,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T449T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0053 ( 12 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0026 ( 61 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
ENST00000456914.7 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.762
Variant links:
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 1-45331227-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45331227-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 183787.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-45331227-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr1-45331227-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.762 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00528 (804/152328) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0314 (163/5192). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0275. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 445 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MUTYHNM_001128425.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1431G>C p.Thr477= synonymous_variant 14/16 ENST00000710952.2 NP_001121897.1
MUTYHNM_001048174.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1347G>C p.Thr449= synonymous_variant 14/16 ENST00000456914.7 NP_001041639.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MUTYHENST00000710952.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1431G>C p.Thr477= synonymous_variant 14/16 NM_001128425.2 ENSP00000518552
MUTYHENST00000456914.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1347G>C p.Thr449= synonymous_variant 14/161 NM_001048174.2 ENSP00000407590 A1Q9UIF7-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00526
AC:
801
AN:
152210
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00987
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0313
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00662
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00678
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00461
AC:
1159
AN:
251482
Hom.:
13
AF XY:
0.00433
AC XY:
589
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00377
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0249
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00869
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00554
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00264
AC:
3853
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
61
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00266
AC XY:
1935
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00959
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00132
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00451
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0398
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00839
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000682
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00358
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00528
AC:
804
AN:
152328
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00597
AC XY:
445
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00977
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0314
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00683
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00678
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00379
Alfa
AF:
0.00177
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00560
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0160
AC:
56
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000981
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 31, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 21, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Silent, high frequency -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 21, 2014- -
not provided Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27829682, 27884173, 16774938, 20981092) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024MUTYH: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 28, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 18, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 21, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 17, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJun 21, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Apr 11, 2023- -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaFeb 09, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Thr477Thr (c.1431G>C ) variant (alias 1389G>C) has been previously reported in the literature in 14/332 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.048) in individuals affected with either adenomatous polyposis, gastric cancer or colorectal cancer, however controls were not included in these studies (Peterlongo 2006, Tao 2004, Yanaru-Fujisawa 2008). This variant has also been identified in the HGMD and LOVD databases, however it is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, and has been reported in dbSNP (ID#:rs74318065), by the 1000 genomes project (frequency 0.016), and ESP project (frequency 0.004). However, there is some conflicting information in the literature. In one study the variant c.1431G > C was found to be in complete linkage disequilibrium with two other MUTYH variants, Ć¢ā‚¬Å”ƃā€žĆƒĀ¬280G > A and c.36+11C>T (alias IVS1+11C>T). A statistically significant association was demonstrated between one of these variants, c.36+11C>T and increased CRC risk (Tao 2008). This indicates that individuals with the MUTYH Ć¢ā‚¬Å”ƃā€žĆƒĀ¬ 280A/c.36+11T/c.1431C genotypes may be susceptible to CRC (Tao 2008). However, replication in additional cohorts and additional functional evidence would be required to validate this finding. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS). -
Gastric cancer;C3272841:Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 17, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.40
DANN
Benign
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs74318065; hg19: chr1-45796899; COSMIC: COSV58344222; COSMIC: COSV58344222; API