1-47251625-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_001048166.1(STIL):āc.3378A>Gā(p.Arg1126=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0059 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0046 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.0060 ( 38 hom. )
Consequence
STIL
NM_001048166.1 synonymous
NM_001048166.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.404
Genes affected
STIL (HGNC:10879): (STIL centriolar assembly protein) This gene encodes a cytoplasmic protein implicated in regulation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint, a regulatory pathway that monitors chromosome segregation during cell division to ensure the proper distribution of chromosomes to daughter cells. The protein is phosphorylated in mitosis and in response to activation of the spindle checkpoint, and disappears when cells transition to G1 phase. It interacts with a mitotic regulator, and its expression is required to efficiently activate the spindle checkpoint. It is proposed to regulate Cdc2 kinase activity during spindle checkpoint arrest. Chromosomal deletions that fuse this gene and the adjacent locus commonly occur in T cell leukemias, and are thought to arise through illegitimate V-(D)-J recombination events. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 1-47251625-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-47251625-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 160063.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-47251625-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.404 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIL | NM_001048166.1 | c.3378A>G | p.Arg1126= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 | ENST00000371877.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIL | ENST00000371877.8 | c.3378A>G | p.Arg1126= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 | 1 | NM_001048166.1 | P5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00459 AC: 698AN: 152196Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
698
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00461 AC: 1159AN: 251238Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00460 AC XY: 624AN XY: 135786
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1159
AN:
251238
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
624
AN XY:
135786
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00604 AC: 8829AN: 1461846Hom.: 38 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00588 AC XY: 4277AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
8829
AN:
1461846
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
4277
AN XY:
727216
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00458 AC: 698AN: 152314Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00443 AC XY: 330AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
698
AN:
152314
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
330
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | STIL: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 10, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 03, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 25, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 09, 2014 | - - |
Microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at