rs142315727

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001048166.1(STIL):​c.3378A>G​(p.Arg1126Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0059 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0046 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0060 ( 38 hom. )

Consequence

STIL
NM_001048166.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.404

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
STIL (HGNC:10879): (STIL centriolar assembly protein) This gene encodes a cytoplasmic protein implicated in regulation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint, a regulatory pathway that monitors chromosome segregation during cell division to ensure the proper distribution of chromosomes to daughter cells. The protein is phosphorylated in mitosis and in response to activation of the spindle checkpoint, and disappears when cells transition to G1 phase. It interacts with a mitotic regulator, and its expression is required to efficiently activate the spindle checkpoint. It is proposed to regulate Cdc2 kinase activity during spindle checkpoint arrest. Chromosomal deletions that fuse this gene and the adjacent locus commonly occur in T cell leukemias, and are thought to arise through illegitimate V-(D)-J recombination events. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
STIL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • holoprosencephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 1-47251625-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-47251625-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 160063.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.404 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00458 (698/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00779 (530/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00724. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 330 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
STILNM_001048166.1 linkc.3378A>G p.Arg1126Arg synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 17 ENST00000371877.8 NP_001041631.1 Q15468-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
STILENST00000371877.8 linkc.3378A>G p.Arg1126Arg synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 17 1 NM_001048166.1 ENSP00000360944.3 Q15468-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00459
AC:
698
AN:
152196
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00779
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00461
AC:
1159
AN:
251238
AF XY:
0.00460
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00592
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00788
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00408
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00604
AC:
8829
AN:
1461846
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00588
AC XY:
4277
AN XY:
727216
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
37
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00188
AC:
84
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
29
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00106
AC:
91
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00620
AC:
331
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
8
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00717
AC:
7975
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00454
AC:
274
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
549
1098
1647
2196
2745
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
288
576
864
1152
1440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00458
AC:
698
AN:
152314
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00443
AC XY:
330
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
60
AN:
41576
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00137
AC:
21
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000829
AC:
4
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00688
AC:
73
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00779
AC:
530
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
4
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
75
113
150
188
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00567
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00421
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00731
EpiControl
AF:
0.00652

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 07, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 09, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 25, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

STIL: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 02, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
7.1
DANN
Benign
0.58
PhyloP100
0.40
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142315727; hg19: chr1-47717297; API