1-58539090-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_145243.5(OMA1):c.205C>T(p.His69Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0035 in 872,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145243.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMA1 | NM_145243.5 | c.205C>T | p.His69Tyr | missense_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000371226.8 | |
DAB1 | NM_001379461.1 | c.-730+7613C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMA1 | ENST00000371226.8 | c.205C>T | p.His69Tyr | missense_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_145243.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00756 AC: 1150AN: 152142Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00354 AC: 889AN: 251126Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00307 AC XY: 417AN XY: 135800
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00264 AC: 1904AN: 720624Hom.: 11 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00243 AC XY: 935AN XY: 384664
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00758 AC: 1154AN: 152260Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00745 AC XY: 555AN XY: 74448
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 18, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at