Variant 1-5909185-G-A details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_015102.5(NPHP4):c.1470C>T(p.Leu490=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0291 in 1,603,376 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 989 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.046 ( 226 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.027 ( 763 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP4
NM_015102.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.09

Variant links:

Genes affected

NPHP4 (HGNC:19104): (nephrocystin 4) This gene encodes a protein involved in renal tubular development and function. This protein interacts with nephrocystin, and belongs to a multifunctional complex that is localized to actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 4, a renal disease, and with Senior-Loken syndrome type 4, a combination of nephronophthisis and retinitis pigmentosa. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

NPHP4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).

BP6

Variant 1-5909185-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-5909185-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 260543.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-5909185-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.09 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0983 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NPHP4	NM_015102.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1470C>T	p.Leu490=	synonymous_variant	12/30	ENST00000378156.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NPHP4	ENST00000378156.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.1470C>T	p.Leu490=	synonymous_variant	12/30	1	NM_015102.5	P2	O75161-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0458

AC:

6971

AN:

152048

Hom.:

226

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.101

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0681

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0167

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0311

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000580

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0261

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0406

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0190

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0249

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0483

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0292

AC:

6689

AN:

229090

Hom.:

159

AF XY:

0.0284

AC XY:

3528

AN XY:

124058

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.105

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0106

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0316

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0308

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0412

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0269

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0274

AC:

39767

AN:

1451210

Hom.:

763

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0271

AC XY:

19544

AN XY:

720546

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.107

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0123

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0332

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000762

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0320

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0420

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0252

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0296

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0458

AC:

6971

AN:

152166

Hom.:

226

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0455

AC XY:

3385

AN XY:

74400

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.101

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0167

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0311

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000581

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0259

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0406

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0249

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0478

Alfa

AF:

0.0310

Hom.:

152

Bravo

AF:

0.0466

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0130

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -

Nephronophthisis 4

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Apr 11, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 4

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Kidney disorder

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Jul 01, 2018

- -

Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 31, 2024

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

May 04, 2021

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.90

CADD

Benign

0.11

DANN

Benign

0.48

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over