1-5978259-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_015102.5(NPHP4):c.279+11G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000702 in 1,601,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015102.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nephronophthisis 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Senior-Loken syndrome 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- nephronophthisis 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Senior-Loken syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPHP4 | NM_015102.5 | c.279+11G>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 29 | ENST00000378156.9 | NP_055917.1 | 
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPHP4 | ENST00000378156.9 | c.279+11G>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 29 | 1 | NM_015102.5 | ENSP00000367398.4 | |||
| NPHP4 | ENST00000378169.7 | n.279+11G>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 26 | 1 | ENSP00000367411.3 | ||||
| NPHP4 | ENST00000489180.6 | n.279+11G>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 32 | 2 | ENSP00000423747.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.00368  AC: 560AN: 152074Hom.:  2  Cov.: 29 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000799  AC: 183AN: 228980 AF XY:  0.000546   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.000381  AC: 552AN: 1448820Hom.:  5  Cov.: 31 AF XY:  0.000345  AC XY: 248AN XY: 719538 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.00376  AC: 572AN: 152192Hom.:  4  Cov.: 29 AF XY:  0.00363  AC XY: 270AN XY: 74396 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified    Benign:1 
- -
Senior-Loken syndrome 4    Benign:1 
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Nephronophthisis    Benign:1 
- -
not provided    Benign:1 
- -
Nephronophthisis 4    Benign:1 
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at