1-89714284-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_032270.5(LRRC8C):āc.1714A>Gā(p.Ile572Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00202 in 1,614,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 89 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032270.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRRC8C | NM_032270.5 | c.1714A>G | p.Ile572Val | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000370454.9 | NP_115646.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRRC8C | ENST00000370454.9 | c.1714A>G | p.Ile572Val | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_032270.5 | ENSP00000359483 | P1 | |
LRRC8C | ENST00000479252.1 | n.393+27673A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00297 AC: 452AN: 152210Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00848 AC: 2128AN: 251064Hom.: 63 AF XY: 0.00659 AC XY: 894AN XY: 135676
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00192 AC: 2810AN: 1461864Hom.: 82 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 1216AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00298 AC: 454AN: 152328Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00338 AC XY: 252AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 30, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at