10-11314177-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_001326342.2(CELF2):c.1015A>T(p.Met339Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Consequence
CELF2
NM_001326342.2 missense
NM_001326342.2 missense
Scores
3
4
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.98
Genes affected
CELF2 (HGNC:2550): (CUGBP Elav-like family member 2) Members of the CELF/BRUNOL protein family contain two N-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains, one C-terminal RRM domain, and a divergent segment of 160-230 aa between the second and third RRM domains. Members of this protein family regulate pre-mRNA alternative splicing and may also be involved in mRNA editing, and translation. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.40737128).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELF2 | NM_001326342.2 | c.1015A>T | p.Met339Leu | missense_variant | 10/13 | ENST00000633077.2 | NP_001313271.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 36
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
36
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 14 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Neuberg Centre For Genomic Medicine, NCGM | Jun 22, 2023 | The observed missense c.994A>T (p.Met332Leu) variant in CELF2 gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. The p.Met332Leu variant is absent in gnomAD Exomes. This variant has not been submitted to the ClinVar database. Computational evidence (Polyphen - Benign, SIFT - Tolerated and MutationTaster - Disease causing) predicts conflicting evidence on protein structure and function for this variant. The reference amino acid of p.Met332Leu in CELF2 is predicted as conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. The amino acid Met at position 332 is changed to a Leu changing protein sequence and it might alter its composition and physico-chemical properties. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;.;D;D;.;D;D;.;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
.;.;.;N;.;.;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
.;.;.;T;.;.;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
.;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0, 0.17
.;.;.;B;B;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.54, 0.54, 0.58, 0.57, 0.57, 0.57, 0.57, 0.56, 0.52
MutPred
0.34
.;.;.;.;.;.;Loss of catalytic residue at M339 (P = 0.0055);Loss of catalytic residue at M339 (P = 0.0055);Loss of catalytic residue at M339 (P = 0.0055);.;.;.;.;.;.;
MVP
0.92
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.