10-18539517-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.1776C>A(p.Asp592Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000439 in 1,613,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201596.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNB2 | NM_201596.3 | c.1776C>A | p.Asp592Glu | missense_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000324631.13 | NP_963890.2 | |
CACNB2 | NM_201590.3 | c.1614C>A | p.Asp538Glu | missense_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000377329.10 | NP_963884.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNB2 | ENST00000324631.13 | c.1776C>A | p.Asp592Glu | missense_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_201596.3 | ENSP00000320025 | ||
CACNB2 | ENST00000377329.10 | c.1614C>A | p.Asp538Glu | missense_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_201590.3 | ENSP00000366546 | ||
ENST00000425669.1 | n.377-218G>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000362 AC: 55AN: 151968Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000438 AC: 110AN: 251314Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000501 AC XY: 68AN XY: 135828
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000447 AC: 653AN: 1461854Hom.: 3 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000492 AC XY: 358AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000362 AC: 55AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74354
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 16, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency; Multiple papers classify as VUS; ClinVar: 1 LB, 2 VUS - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 11, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 13, 2023 | Variant summary: CACNB2 c.1614C>A (p.Asp538Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00044 in 251314 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 140 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CACNB2 causing Brugada Syndrome phenotype (3.1e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likely benign n=3, VUS n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Brugada syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | Low GERP score may suggest that this variant may belong in a lower pathogenicity class - |
Brugada syndrome 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 10, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 09, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at