10-43102628-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The NM_020975.6(RET):c.624G>T(p.Glu208Asp) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000669 in 1,613,928 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 18/24 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E208Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020975.6 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial medullary thyroid carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P
- multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2AInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
- multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2BInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- pheochromocytomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Haddad syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Hirschsprung diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- renal agenesis, unilateralInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- bilateral renal agenesisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- renal agenesisInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RET | NM_020975.6 | c.624G>T | p.Glu208Asp | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 3 of 20 | ENST00000355710.8 | NP_066124.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RET | ENST00000355710.8 | c.624G>T | p.Glu208Asp | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 3 of 20 | 5 | NM_020975.6 | ENSP00000347942.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000183 AC: 46AN: 250836 AF XY: 0.000236 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000718 AC: 105AN: 1461666Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000111 AC XY: 81AN XY: 727156 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74386 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
RET-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at